'Supreme Court Has To Uphold Constitution'
Fakhir Rizvi Published January 10, 2017 | 06:35 PM
ISLAMABAD, (UrduPoint / Pakistan Point News - 10th Jan, 2017 ) : Resuming hearing of the Panama papers case, the larger bench of Supreme Court here Tuesday remarked that apex court has to uphold the constitution.
"We have taken oath to uphold the constitution. We are not a trial court", the bench said adding the apex court can not investigate the matter and then give judgment like a trial court. A five-member larger bench of the apex court headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and comprising Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, Justice Ijaz Afzal Khan, Justice Gulzar Ahmad and Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan heard the case.
During the proceedings, Justice Ijaz Afzal remarked that disqualification of the prime minister on mere assumption would be a dangerous judicial precedent and "we don't want to set any such precedent".
He questioned as to whether it would be appropriate to give judgment on documents which did not fulfill the legal requirements. The honourable judge asked as how conflict could be solved without recording evidence? Prime Minister's link with Panama papers and his speech are two different matters, he added.
During the course of hearing, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf lead counsel Naeem Bukhari continued his arguments. Justice Azmat Saeed while addressing the PTI counsel remarked that he (Naeem Bukhari) should satisfy the court instead of making speech to the nation.
The PTI counsel is pressing the court to take decision on the basis of opinion without any evidence and the report he is referring to has been rejected by even FIA itself, then how the court can give judgment on such report.
Justice Asif Saeed Khosa told Bukhari that his research is extraordinary but what is the use of it when he himself asked the apex court to investigate the matter first and then give decision. He also remarked that the matter before the court is a constitutional question with regard to disqualification, thus how the apex court can hold trial in this case at the moment.
Upon this, Naeem Bukhari said the lead counsel was Hamid Khan and he was just assisting him in the matter. Hamid Khan recused himself from the case and whole burden was shifted on his shoulders, he expressed.
Justice Asif Saeed Khosa asked, "Without any evidence can the court give verdict". Taking his words back, Justice Asif Khosa said, "I should not have given an observation regarding Article 62 and 63". The bench later adjourned hearing of four identical petitions filed by PTI and others seeking investigation into the Panama Papers till Wednesday (January 11). APP/amk/asg
Related Topics
Recent Stories
PTI to stage nationwide protests against alleged electoral frauds
Senate continues discussion on Presidential address to Joint Sitting of Parliame ..
Masood Khan calls for Pak-US cooperation for regional peace
Interior Minister starts Margalla Trail Patrol for security
Currency Rate In Pakistan - Dollar, Euro, Pound, Riyal Rates On 26 April 2024
Today Gold Rate in Pakistan 26 April 2024
ICC Womens T20 World Cup Qualifier, Match 2: Ireland Women open with Comfortable ..
Robinson, bowlers help New Zealand go 2-1 up against Pakistan
Shahzeb Chachar to hold khuli kachehri on April 26
Heatwave amid Israel's aggression in Gaza brings new misery, disease risk
Tourism must change, mayor says as Venice launches entry fee
Court adjourns Judicial Complex attack case till May 17
More Stories From Pakistan
-
Global experts conclude landmark Int’l Zoology Congress at UAJK
3 minutes ago -
ANF recovers 90 kg drugs in 11 operations
3 minutes ago -
Enmity claims life of youth
13 minutes ago -
Saudi Arabia's Umrah and Ziyarah Forum focuses on innovative ways to enhance pilgrim experience
13 minutes ago -
PNCA , IFWA to organize a special puppet show
23 minutes ago -
Third New Venture Contest 2024 concludes
23 minutes ago
-
Seven fuel agencies sealed
23 minutes ago -
Three killed as the car overturned
23 minutes ago -
Anti Polio campaign to launch on April 9 in Khairpur: DC
33 minutes ago -
Drug peddler held
53 minutes ago -
Lawmakers highlight critical issues from their respective areas
1 hour ago -
UoM student defends MPhil theses
1 hour ago